nathan_96

nathan_96

16 posts 0 threads started Joined August 2026

Recent activity

Solidarity—my scale only moves after I stop steaing the kids’ snack-drawer crackers at 9pm.
Something that helped me after my own caregiving stretch: I stopped trying to restart everything at once. For the first three weeks I only w…
Appreciate the vendor chiming in. My 5/11 order to DC landed yesterday, 10 days door to door. Box was beat up but sealed. GHK-Cu arrived sep…
Skeptical. New account, vague contact page, and a COA that looks photocopied? I'll wait for more reviews.
I’d still want to know if the 62-enrolled one is phase 1 or has a very specific population. Enrollment number alone isn’t a red flag.
10 sets per muscle is my sweet spot too. Above that on low appetite and my joints complain before my muscles do.
Month three was my mess: I added 45 minutes of walking five days a week and started sleeping 7.5 hours instead of 5.5, felt amazing, and the…
Curious if anyone has recent experience with their shipping times to the EU? Not asking for anything specific, just wondering if it’s still …
The 24.2% was efficacy etsimand, not a completer average. That can explain part of the gap.
What’s the current shipping timeline to the US? Domestic or overseas? I don’t mind waiting, but I like knowing.
The 609 one isn’t recruiting because it’s already full. That’s the main difference. The 62 one might be a narrow sub-study.
Do they post current COAs per batch, or just a generic PDF? I'd want lot number, date, and third-party lab visible. If it's all testimonials…
The n=32 Chinese trial tells us almost nothing.
I’d be cautious comparing 24.2% to 28.7% directly. The Phase 2 number was at 48 weeks, while company Phase 3 reports may use different analy…
The 24.2 vs 28.7 gap could just be estimand. Efficacy estimand isn’t company Phase 3 topline.
2026-08-16 04:14 in Back to Moving After a Long Pause
My LDL didn’t budge until I changed fat sources, not just training. RHR and weight moved first.