Test Your Peptide For Free

Send us your peptide sample and get an independent HPLC lab test — identity, purity, and fill weight. No cost. Optional paid add-ons available.

HPLC + LC-MS 5-7 day results 100% confidential
Get My Free Test

MOTS-c

Mitochondrial-derived peptide studied for metabolic health, insulin sensitivity, exercise capacity, and cellular energy support.

4.3
30 reviews
Rate This Peptide

Overview

MOTS-c (Mitochondrial ORF of 12S rRNA type-c) is a 16-amino-acid peptide encoded in the mitochondrial genome — one of the few known peptides translated from mitochondrial DNA. Research suggests MOTS-c activates AMPK signaling, supports insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism, and may counter age-related metabolic decline. Early human data and animal studies also point to effects on exercise capacity and cellular stress response. MOTS-c remains investigational and is not FDA-approved; the links below connect to our dosage chart and calculator for educational reference only.

Key Information

Identity
Also Known As MOTS c; Mitochondrial open reading frame of the 12S rRNA type-c
Sequence Met-Arg-Leu-Phe-Lys-Gly-Pro-Arg-Ser-Ser-Leu-Cys-Ala-Leu-Pro-Val (16 aa)
CAS Number N/A
Molecular Formula N/A
Properties
Half-Life Short (~1 hour, estimated)
Administration subcutaneous
Dosage Range 5-10 mg weekly (research protocols)
Price Range $1.5–$8.0/mg
Handling & Storage
Storage Lyophilized: -20C; Reconstituted: 2-8C
Reconstitution Reconstitute with bacteriostatic water; use within 28 days refrigerated
Regulatory Status
US Status Research only
Research Papers 0 indexed

Mechanism

Activates AMPK through an AICAR-independent pathway, modulates the endothelin A receptor (ETAR), improves mitochondrial energy coupling, and translocates to the nucleus to regulate stress-response gene expression.

Benefits

  • Insulin sensitivity support
  • Metabolic health research
  • Exercise capacity studies
  • AMPK activation
  • Cellular energy (mitochondrial) support

Side Effects

  • Injection-site reactions (redness, bruising)
  • Potential allergic reaction
  • Long-term safety not established

Contraindications

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Diabetes medication use without medical supervision
  • Known mitochondrial disorders — consult specialist

Evidence Summary

Early human and animal research support metabolic effects; no FDA-approved indication.

Research

Preclinical and early human research suggest improved insulin sensitivity, glucose metabolism, and exercise performance. A phase 2a clinical trial has studied fixed-dose MOTS-c protocols for metabolic health.

Safety

Commonly reported side effects are injection-site reactions. Long-term human safety data is limited; no FDA-approved dosing exists.

Frequently Asked Questions About MOTS-c

What is MOTS-c?

MOTS-c is a research peptide also known as MOTS c; Mitochondrial open reading frame of the 12S rRNA type-c. Mitochondrial-derived peptide studied for metabolic health, insulin sensitivity, exercise capacity, and cellular energy support. It is studied for its potential therapeutic applications and is available from various research chemical vendors.

How does MOTS-c work?

Activates AMPK through an AICAR-independent pathway, modulates the endothelin A receptor (ETAR), improves mitochondrial energy coupling, and translocates to the nucleus to regulate stress-response gene expression.

What is the recommended dosage for MOTS-c?

The commonly studied dosage range for MOTS-c is 5-10 mg weekly (research protocols). Dosage protocols vary based on research objectives. Always consult published studies and start with conservative amounts. MOTS-c should only be used in controlled research settings.

Where can I buy MOTS-c?

PepsReview indexes MOTS-c pricing from multiple vendors. Check the Vendors tab above for a price comparison table showing cost per milligram, purity, COA status, and stock availability. Vendor reviews from real users are available on each vendor's profile page.

Is MOTS-c legal?

US regulatory status: Research only. The legal status of MOTS-c varies by jurisdiction. In most countries, it is sold as a research chemical, not for human consumption. Always verify the legal status in your country before purchasing.

What are the side effects of MOTS-c?

Reported side effects include: Injection-site reactions (redness, bruising), Potential allergic reaction, Long-term safety not established. Always review safety data and published studies before use.

Related Anti-aging / Longevity Peptides

Other peptides in the anti-aging / longevity category that may be of interest for comparative research:

Vendor Price Comparison

Product Vendor Size Price $/mg Purity COA Stock Visit
MOTS-c 10mg 10.0mg $28.00 $2.80 99.8% SideChain Analytics (HPLC-MS/MS) (1d) In Stock Visit
MOTS-C 40mg 40.0mg $159.00 $3.98 99%+ — In Stock Visit

No research papers

No papers have been indexed for this peptide yet.

Write a Review

Rating Breakdown

Effectiveness
4.3
Overall
4.3
Safety
4.0
Value
3.9

Based on 30 reviews.

Reviews

MOTS-C: good metabolic boost, mild sides 2026-10-08
Wade M. Verified Reviewer

41, graphic designer. I picked MOTS-C mostly because it was the first metabolic peptide I actually figured out how to get, before I even knew much about the others. Ran 10 mg/week subQ, split Mon/Thu, for 8 weeks. Fasting glucose dropped from 103 to 91, lost about 5 lbs without changing much, waist down an inch, and afternoon crash went away. Appetite didn’t change much. First week had mild headache and some injection-site redness. I’d still choose it again, though I wish dosing was once weekly. Overall happy.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C for visceral fat: decent results with minimal sides 2026-09-29
Sandra H. Verified Reviewer

45yo dev here. Ran MOTS-C at 10mg/week split into two 5mg subq injections for 6 weeks. Stacked with my usual cardio (hiking 3x/week) and some resistance bands. Dropped about 8 lbs and my waist went from 38 to 36 inches. Visceral fat feels way down. Fasting glucose went from 105 to 92. Appetite didn't change much, so I still had to watch calories. Only side effect was a little redness at injection sites and slight fatigue first week. Not a magic bullet, but solid for metabolic health. Worth trying if you're already putting in the work.

Effectiveness: 5/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
Modest but real for solo MOTS-C 2026-09-21
Rosa H. Verified Reviewer

45-year-old stay-at-home dad here, not a big med guy. I ran MOTS-C solo because I didn’t want to stack anything. Did 5 mg subcutaneous three times a week for 8 weeks. Waist went from 38.5 to 37 inches, scale dropped about 6 lbs. Belly still there but less bloated, pants fit better. Appetite didn’t change much. First two weeks I got mild redness at injection sites and some tiredness a few hours after dosing. After that it faded. Energy in afternoons was a bit better. No bloodwork yet, so I can’t claim metabolic magic. Modest visceral fat help, not a miracle.

Effectiveness: 5/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C review: steady energy, modest fat loss 2026-09-18
Boris M. Verified Reviewer

I’m 41, working 24-hour medic shifts, so energy and metabolic health matter. A buddy and his son had already run MOTS-C, and I saw their waistlines and bloodwork improve, so I tried it instead of the usual GLP-1 route. I did 10 mg subq once weekly for 8 weeks. Lost 6 lbs and 1.5 inches off my waist. Fasting glucose dropped from 99 to 90. Appetite didn’t change much, but I had steadier energy on night calls. Mild redness at injection sites and a headache after dose one. It’s not as well-known as semaglutide, so explaining it to my doctor took extra effort. Solid, not magic.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C for visceral fat and training 2026-09-17
Marco M. Verified Reviewer

31, chef, on my feet 10-12 hrs. Ran MOTS-C 10mg subq Mon/Wed/Fri for 6 weeks, kept my usual cardio (hiking 3x/wk) and added resistance training after my back calmed down. Waist dropped from 36.5 to 35 in, scale down 4.6 lbs, and my fasting glucose went from 99 to 91. Appetite didn't change much, honestly. First week I got mild headaches and some redness at injection sites, but that faded. Visceral fat seems less, shirts fit better. Not magic, but worth it if you're already training. Plan to run another 4 weeks.

Effectiveness: 5/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C helped my knees and energy 2026-09-17
Camille D. Verified Reviewer

53-year-old electrician here. Ran MOTS-C for 6 weeks: 10mg/week, split 5mg Monday and Thursday, subQ. Knee tendonitis pain went from 7/10 to 3/10, and I could do ladder work without hip ache. Fasted glucose dropped about 12 points. Recovery after long days felt quicker, maybe 30% better. First week I had mild headaches and a red bump at injection sites. Gut stuff? Not much change. Sleep maybe 20 minutes better. Price is steep, but I'd run it again for joints and energy.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C: decent metabolic tune-up, not magic 2026-09-07
Omar H. Verified Reviewer

I’m 50, dev, so I over-research everything. Tried MOTS-C 10 mg subQ once weekly for 8 weeks. Energy up by week 2, no jitters. Fasting glucose went 104→95, triglycerides 150→132, lost about 5 lb and 1.5 inches off waist. Appetite wasn’t really changed. Mild injection-site redness and a couple headaches early on. Sleep was slightly off first week. Not a miracle, but bloodwork and energy improved enough that I’d run it again. Cost is high for the modest fat loss, so value is just okay. Wanted the shiny new thing; got a decent metabolic tune-up.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 3/5
MOTS-C helped my midsection and blood sugar 2026-08-29
Lena M. Verified Reviewer

I'm 52, run a busy kitchen, and my belly fat and fasting glucose were creeping up. Ran MOTS-C at 10 mg subQ three times a week for six weeks. Weight went 228 to 219, waist dropped about 1.5 inches, and fasting glucose fell from 108 to 92. Appetite wasn't hugely blunted, but I wasn't crashing between services. Energy was steadier. Side effects were minor: red lumps at injection sites and a couple of headaches the first week. No real change in gym strength. It's not a miracle, but for metabolic cleanup and visceral fat it felt worth it.

Effectiveness: 5/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
Worked for me, no issues even at 12mg 2026-08-25
Kayla M. Verified Reviewer

I'm 55 and drive a truck, so sitting all day had me at 248 lbs. My oldest mentioned MOTS-C, never heard of it before. I looked into it and ran 5mg once a week for 4 weeks, then 10mg for 3 weeks, last week 12mg. My wife used it too. After 8 weeks I'm down 12 lbs, waist lost about an inch. Appetite wasn't crushed but I stopped snacking at night. Fasting sugar went from 104 to 93. Energy on long hauls felt steadier. No bad reactions, just a little redness at injection spots. We were lucky, nothing bad right up to 12mg. Would buy again.

Effectiveness: 5/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C solo worked for modest visceral fat loss 2026-08-25
Camille H. Verified Reviewer

31, software dev, mostly desk-bound. I was nervous about stacking anything, so I ran MOTS-C alone at 10 mg subQ twice weekly for 8 weeks. Kept diet same-ish, added 3 walks/week. Weight went 198 to 191. Waist tape dropped about 1.5 in; InBody visceral fat score moved from 11 to 9, so modest but real. Appetite didn't change much. First week had mild injection-site redness and some afternoon fatigue, then nothing. No glycemic issues, fasting glucose stayed around 90. If you want a huge visceral fat swing, this isn't that, but as a standalone it was worth it for me.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
Solid recomp aid for a 47-year-old trainer 2026-08-23
Drew H. Verified Reviewer

Ran MOTS-C at 10mg subQ three times a week for 8 weeks. Started at 205 lbs and 22% body fat. Ended at 193 and 17.5%—about a 4.5% drop. Fasting glucose went from 102 to 91, triglycerides 145 to 118. Appetite didn't change much, so don't expect that. Had some mild injection site redness and a bit of fatigue the first week. If your body fat is higher, honestly any 5% loss shows up in the mirror and bloodwork. I'd run it again.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C review: solid for training, no sides at 12mg 2026-08-21
Peter H. Verified Reviewer

My oldest brought up MOTS-C, so I looked into it and gave it a shot. I'm 50, train clients all day, wanted help with midsection and energy. Ran 5mg subq 3x/week for 4 weeks, then 10mg weekly for 4 weeks, last 2 weeks at 12mg. No negative effects at all. My wife used it too, same story. Lost 7 lbs, waist down 1.5 inches, fasting glucose 99 to 92. Appetite wasn't crushed, just less snacking. Recovery felt quicker. Only issue was occasional mild injection site sting. Not magic, but I'd run it again.

Effectiveness: 5/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C dropped 5% body fat and improved my labs 2026-08-19
Juan H. Verified Reviewer

I’m 52, retired mechanic, 5’6” and started MOTS-C at 10 mg subq five days on, two off. Ran it eight weeks. DEXA went from 34.6% to 29.8% body fat—about 5 points. Waist dropped 2.5 inches. Fasting glucose fell 106 to 94, and my LDL went 138 to 116. Appetite didn’t change much, honestly. First week I had some injection-site knots and slight queasiness, but nothing after that. Energy was decent. If your body fat is high, don’t obsess over which fat is going; 5% off changes how you look and moves labs. I’d buy again, though it’s pricey.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
Solid but not magic for fat loss 2026-08-13
Felix H. Verified Reviewer

I’m 41 and home with the kids all day, so I wanted something to help with stubborn midsection fat. I ran MOTS-C at 5 mg subQ on Mon/Wed/Fri for 8 weeks. Weight went from 168 to 157 lbs, waist down 1.5 inches, and morning fasting glucose dropped from 102 to about 94. Appetite didn’t change much, so I still had to track calories. First week I had mild headaches and a little redness at injection sites, but that faded. Energy in the afternoons improved. Not a miracle, but worth it if your diet is already decent.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C helped my midsection but not a miracle 2026-08-03
Kristy H. Verified Reviewer

38, PT here. Added MOTS-C at 10mg once weekly for 8 weeks while still split-dosing reta/tirz for visceral fat. Waist dropped about 1.5 inches and my scale's visceral fat estimate went 13 to 11. Appetite was already low, so no big change there. Energy on hikes was steady. Mild redness at injection sites, some sleep disruption first two weeks, and cramping if I skipped electrolytes. Holding off on the tesa 20s until my back settles. Not cheap, but a decent metabolic bump.

Effectiveness: 5/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C gave me steady energy, not appetite suppression 2026-07-30
Alicia H. Verified Reviewer

I got into MOTS-C before I even knew about tirz or reta. It was just the first peptide that crossed my path. Not sure why people jump to reta over tirz, but MOTS-C is different—it’s not an appetite killer. I ran 5 mg subQ three times a week for 8 weeks. Energy in the gym went up, recovery got better, fasting glucose dropped from 101 to 92. Lost about 5 lbs, waist down an inch, no real appetite change. Mild headache and red injection spots the first two weeks. Wouldn’t call it a weight-loss miracle, but it’s a solid metabolic tool. Value is decent if you source well.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
Solid for visceral fat with training 2026-07-30
Nina H. Verified Reviewer

Been running MOTS-C for 10 weeks now, 10 mg/week split into two 5 mg subQ shots. I'm 52, drive long haul, back was wrecked so I sat on the vials a bit. Once cleared, I added resistance bands in the cab and hiking on resets. Down about 3 inches off my waist and 12 lbs, visceral bloat way less. Energy on long drives is steadier. Mild injection site redness first few weeks, some vivid dreams. Appetite didn't change much. No glucose issues. Not magic but solid with training.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C alone was a decent first run 2026-07-26
Ivy M. Verified Reviewer

I’m 28, a teacher, and pretty new to peptides. I ran MOTS-C alone at 5 mg subq three times a week for 8 weeks and didn’t stack anything. Down about 7 lbs, waist down 1.5 inches, and my afternoon energy is much steadier. Visceral fat is hard to measure exactly, but my clothes fit better around the middle. Appetite didn’t change much. I had mild redness at injection sites and a few headaches early on. Blood sugar seemed stable. Not a miracle, but solid for a first run.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C helped my energy and waistline 2026-07-25
Priya H. Verified Reviewer

I went with MOTS-C because my coworker and her sister had used it and I saw their energy and leaning out firsthand. I liked the mitochondrial angle more than just another GLP-1. Did 5 mg subQ twice weekly for 6 weeks. Down 6 lbs, waist 1.5 inches, fasting glucose from 96 to 88. Appetite wasn't crushed, more like fewer afternoon cravings. First week I had mild fatigue and red injection spots. No heart racing. It's experimental, so doctor talks take explaining. Would use again.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C solo for belly fat—decent but not magic 2026-07-24
Miguel M. Verified Reviewer

52 y/o realtor here. I’m pretty new to peptides and didn’t want to stack anything, so I ran MOTS-C alone. 10 mg subQ three times a week for 8 weeks. Starting weight 214, ended 204. Waist went from 40 to 37.5 inches, and my fasting glucose dropped from 104 to 96. Appetite didn’t change much, but energy on showing days was steadier. Some red lumps at injection sites and a little tired the evening after dosing, nothing bad. Visceral fat loss was modest, not Tesa-level, but real. For a first solo run, I’d do it again.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C gave me steady energy and better glucose numbers 2026-07-21
Marisol H. Verified Reviewer

34M dev, desk job. I started MOTS-C at 10 mg subQ once weekly for 8 weeks. First two pins left a small red welt that faded in a day. Around week 3 I noticed cleaner energy, no afternoon crash. Fasting glucose went from 103 to 91. Weight dropped 7 lbs, mostly around waist, and my 5k pace improved. Appetite didn’t change much, so it’s not a GLP-1 replacement. Sleep was slightly off first week, then fine. I’d buy again for metabolic support, but it’s not magic.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C helped my waist and glucose, not a miracle 2026-07-19
Rob H. Verified Reviewer

I’m 41 and work as a chef, so constant tasting and late nights messed with my weight. Ran MOTS-C at 10 mg subq once a week for 8 weeks. Down about 6 lbs, waist lost 1.5 inches, and my fasting glucose dropped from 102 to 91. Appetite wasn’t crushed like a GLP, but I wasn’t snacky after shifts. Energy was solid. Had some redness at injection sites and a couple of blah days early on. It’s not a magic fat burner, but my labs and midsection improved. Would use again.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C worked better than I expected for my metabolism 2026-07-17
Tanisha H. Verified Reviewer

I picked MOTS-C because a close friend and her daughter had already run it, so I saw their changes firsthand instead of guessing. The mitochondrial/AMPK angle appealed to me more than another GLP-1. I did 10 mg subQ three times weekly for 8 weeks. Down 9 lbs, waist lost 1.5 inches, fasting glucose went from 104 to 92. Appetite wasn't crushed, but my energy and afternoon crashes improved. Side effects were mild: injection-site redness and a few headaches early on. A friend stuck with tirzepatide because it's familiar and easier to explain to her doctor. I get that—MOTS-C takes more explaining.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C at 43: solid 5% body fat drop 2026-07-12
Tanya M. Verified Reviewer

I'm 43, barber, on my feet all day. Ran MOTS-C at 5 mg twice a week for 10 weeks. Started around 25% body fat, 212 lbs. Dropped to about 20%, 198 lbs. Waist went from 38 to 36. Fasting glucose came down from 103 to 91, and my HDL ticked up a bit. Energy was steadier, no jittery feeling. First two pins left red welts that faded in a day. Slight headache after first dose, nothing after. Appetite didn't change much. If your body fat is higher, don't stress over what type of fat you're losing. A 5% drop shows in the mirror and on bloodwork. I'd buy again.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C solo: modest visceral fat drop, better afternoon energy 2026-07-11
Camille H. Verified Reviewer

I'm 31, software dev, pretty new to peptides and didn't want to stack anything. Ran MOTS-C solo at 5 mg subQ three times a week for 8 weeks. Didn't change diet much, maybe added 2 gym sessions weekly. Scale went from 198 to 191 lbs, waist down about 1.25 inches. DEXA showed visceral fat dropped a bit, not dramatic but noticeable. Appetite was pretty normal. Energy in afternoon was better. Side effects: mild redness at injection sites and a couple headaches first week. No weird labs. It's not a magic fat burner, but for solo use I'd call it modestly effective.

Effectiveness: 5/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
Good metabolic boost without the GLP-1 hassle 2026-07-11
Boris M. Verified Reviewer

I’m 41, work as a paramedic, and picked MOTS-C after a partner at my station ran it for 10 weeks. I saw his labs and waistline change, so I tried 5 mg subQ three times a week for 8 weeks. Down 8 lbs, waist lost about 1.5 inches, fasting glucose went from 104 to 93. Energy on 12-hour shifts is steadier. Appetite didn’t drop much, maybe slightly. Side effects were mild: red bumps at injection sites and a dull headache a few hours after dosing. I considered a GLP-1, but liked the mitochondrial angle. My coworker stuck with tirzepatide because it’s easier to bring up with doctors. MOTS-C needs more explanation.

Effectiveness: 5/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C helped my numbers, not a big fat burner 2026-07-05
Dana M. Verified Reviewer

52yo office guy here. Ran MOTS-C at 10mg subQ once weekly for 8 weeks. Weight went 214 to 207, waist down about 1.5 inches. Fasting glucose dropped from 104 to 92, which surprised me. But honestly I don't think it melts visceral fat on its own like a GLP would. If you lose real weight, visceral and belly fat come down anyway, plus some lean mass. MOTS-C felt milder. Side effects: first two shots gave mild fatigue and red lumps at injection sites that faded. Energy was slightly better weeks 3-6. Not cheap, but I'd use it again for metabolic support.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 3/5
MOTS-C: decent lean-out, mild sides 2026-07-05
Greg H. Verified Reviewer

38-year-old retired mechanic. Ran MOTS-C at 10 mg subq three times a week for 8 weeks. I was chasing the newest thing after tirzepatide, and this looked cleaner. Strength stayed up, lost 12 lbs, waist dropped 1.5 inches. Fasting glucose went 104 to 91, triglycerides down about 40 points. Appetite didn't change much. First week I had mild fatigue and red lumps at injection sites, gone by week two. No resting heart rate jump. Cost is okay, injections are manageable. Not as dramatic as GLP-1s for weight, but I feel leaner and labs improved.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C helped my energy and gym recovery, not injuries 2026-07-05
Peter N. Verified Reviewer

I’m 33, work as a programmer, and ran MOTS-C at 10 mg/week subQ for 8 weeks. Around week 3 my afternoon crashes improved—maybe 30% less need for extra coffee. Leg-day soreness dropped from 3 days to about 1.5. Side effects: red lump at injection site for a day, mild headache first two pins, slightly lighter sleep. Old wrist tendon ache unchanged. Gut stayed normal. No wounds to test. I’d buy again for energy and training recovery, but not for injury repair.

Effectiveness: 4/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5
MOTS-C solo for a beginner: modest but worth it 2026-06-29
Ivy M. Verified Reviewer

I’m 28, teach middle school, and was brand new to peptides. I wanted a little visceral fat loss but was nervous about stacking, so I ran MOTS-C alone: 5 mg subQ three times a week for 8 weeks. Waist went from 31.5 to 30 inches, scale down 6 lbs, and fasting glucose dropped from 98 to 91. Appetite wasn’t hugely changed, maybe a bit less snacking. BP stayed around 110/70. First week I had some fatigue and mild redness at injection sites, nothing after that. No wild fat loss, but for solo use I’m happy. I’d consider it again before adding anything.

Effectiveness: 5/5 Safety: 4/5 Value: 4/5